By Olorogun Ese Onovughe
Information reaching us suggests that there are plans within the Urhobo Progress Union (UPU) Electoral Committee to disqualify certain aspirants from standing for elective positions on the alleged grounds that they are not “members” of the UPU. Such an action, if true, would not only be unconstitutional but could also trigger far-reaching consequences that may threaten the unity, credibility, and future of our revered apex body—the UPU.
The UPU Constitution Is Clear on Membership
Article 8 of the UPU 2024 Constitution defines membership without ambiguity. It recognizes every Urhobo man and woman—by birth, marriage, or naturalization—who subscribes to the aims and objectives of the Union and fulfills their obligations, including the payment of dues, levies, and participation in UPU activities. Nowhere does the Constitution limit membership to attendance at a particular branch or require political allegiance or institutional affiliation as a condition for contesting elective offices .
The Constitution further empowers the National Congress as the supreme organ of the Union, representing all Urhobos at home and in the diaspora. Thus, anyone who identifies with and contributes to the ideals, progress, and development of the Urhobo Nation qualifies as a bona fide member of the UPU.
Disqualification on Membership Grounds Contradicts Due Process
It would be unconstitutional, discriminatory, and contrary to the spirit of inclusiveness that defines the UPU to attempt to disqualify any candidate on arbitrary or restrictive interpretations of membership. Such a move would:
1. Contradict Article 8 of the UPU Constitution, which guarantees broad membership.
2. Violate the principles of fairness and transparency outlined in Article 32 on electoral conduct.
3. Expose the UPU to litigation risks for procedural abuse and breach of constitutional rights.
4. Damage the moral authority of the Union, eroding the trust of millions of Urhobo sons and daughters who see the UPU as the umbrella body for all.
A Caution Against Institutional Sabotage
The UPU Electoral Committee must remember that it is a creation of the Constitution and not above it. Its role is administrative—not judicial or political. The Committee cannot arrogate to itself powers to determine who is Urhobo enough to contest. Doing so would not only undermine the credibility of the election but also cast a dark shadow on the integrity of the entire process.
Any disqualification based on “membership” outside the constitutional provisions will be seen as a deliberate act of exclusion and manipulation, and could invite legitimate resistance, legal action, or civil protest by Urhobo patriots who will not stand by while history is twisted for narrow interests.
The Way Forward
The Electoral Committee is therefore strongly advised to:
• Conduct the screening strictly in accordance with the 2024 UPU Constitution.
• Avoid subjective judgments or political bias in determining eligibility.
• Embrace transparency, fairness, and inclusiveness as guiding principles.
• Ensure that all qualified Urhobo sons and daughters are allowed to stand for election, in the spirit of unity and renewal.
Conclusion
This election is not merely about who wins or loses—it is about the soul of the UPU. The Committee has a historic responsibility to safeguard the integrity of the process. Any attempt to subvert justice or weaponize the screening process will not only divide the Urhobo Nation but could set a dangerous precedent that future generations will struggle to undo.
The UPU belongs to all Urhobos, not a privileged few. The Constitution is our compass, and adherence to it is non-negotiable.
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”
— Thomas Jefferson
Let wisdom, fairness, and respect for due process guide every decision henceforth.
Olorogun Ese Onovughe JP
President, Urhobo United Forum (UUF)
