By Lawrence Efeturi
The conversation around political representation in Isoko is entering a more decisive phase. For years, electoral outcomes have reflected open democratic competition. At the same time, they have produced patterns where key legislative positions tilt more heavily toward one bloc than the other. While this has never been unconstitutional, it has continued to generate debate about long term balance and collective political strength.
Current office distribution often shapes this conversation. At present, Isoko South holds two statutory seats in the Delta State House of Assembly through Hon. Ferguson Onwo representing Isoko South Constituency II and Hon. Bino Owhede representing Isoko South Constituency I. The Delta South Senatorial seat is also held by Sen. Joel Onowakpo Thomas, who is from Isoko South.
Isoko North, on the other hand, currently holds the State Assembly seat through Hon. Barr. Bernard Odior representing Isoko North Constituency, as well as the House of Representatives seat through Engr. (Pst.) Hon. Jonathan Ajirioghene Ukodhiko, who represents Isoko North and South Federal Constituency.
Within this structure, some political observers believe that retaining the House of Representatives seat in Isoko North could help maintain a broader spread of political representation across the Isoko nation. This argument is increasingly framed around political strategy rather than zoning sentiment.
Constituencies that distribute influence across multiple levels of government often strengthen their bargaining position in negotiations at both federal and state levels. Supporters of the current arrangement argue that maintaining the House of Representatives seat in Isoko North could strengthen Isoko’s overall negotiating voice.
There is also the factor of continuity. Federal legislative work is cumulative. Projects, committee relationships, policy advocacy, and agency engagements usually develop over time. In this regard, some stakeholders point to the ongoing legislative and constituency engagements associated with Rep. Ukodhiko’s tenure as part of the continuity argument being advanced in political discussions.
At the same time, democratic openness must remain respected. Elections exist to allow the people to decide. However, voter decisions are often strongest when guided by both performance assessment and long term regional calculation.
The emerging political environment in Isoko therefore appears to be moving toward two parallel considerations. One is competence and track record. The other is distribution balance across major elective offices. Where both intersect, political stability often strengthens.
As the next electoral cycle approaches, the debate is likely to shift from emotional positioning to strategic calculation. The central question may no longer be simply who contests, but how representation choices shape Isoko’s collective voice in Abuja and beyond.
If managed carefully, this moment could mark a transition from competitive fragmentation toward coordinated political strength across Isoko as a whole.
Lawrence Efeturi, Assoc.CIEPUK
The Insight Pen, (Writes from Isoko)
